You can find, contribute to, and create other common 1L, 2L, and 3L cases in the Law School Cases category. Negligence is a relative term and its existence must depend in each case upon the particular circumstances which surrounded the parties at the time and place of the events upon which the controversy is based.[5]. 393 A.2d 1175 (Pa. 1978) Alexander v. Spivey v. Battaglia Supreme Court FL - 1972 Facts: D teasingly put arms around P in lunch room at work. Get free access to the complete judgment in SPIVEY v. BATTAGLIA FRUIT COMPANY on CaseMine. Spivey v. Sumner County (Summary) Spivey v. Sumner County, No. The court holds that a reasonable man could not foresee the events that occurred here in this case, and that changes the action from being one of assault and battery to one of negligence. We are looking to hire attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site. In response, Garratt sued Dailey for battery. S. CHWARTZ S. T. ORTS. Spivey v Battaglia ( Supreme Court of Florida, 1972) Relevant Facts---- Spivey and Battaglia were employees of Battaglia Fruit Co. At lunch several employees were sitting around. Fourth District, Spivey v. Battaglia, Fla.App., 242 So.2d 477 (1971). Jan. 26, 1972. * Mrs. Treamenda Spivey and Mr. Richard Spivey sought damages incurred as the result of an automobile accident which occurred on a rainy day near Franklinton, North Carolina, at about 5 p.m. on July 29, 1985. Timing: Read before Day One Purpose: This document contains the expected learning outcomes for Lawyering Fundamentals. Choose from 500 different sets of intentional torts flashcards on Quizlet. Battaglia (defendant), as a joke because the plaintiff was shy, gave her a “friendly, unsolicited” hug. INTENT CASE hug between coworkers case that caused paralysis of plaintiff's face. When Garratt was starting to sit down in a chair, Brian moved it, resulting in Garratt’s fall in which she sustained a broken hip. V, s 4, F.S.A.1 Petitioner (plaintiff in the trial court) and respondent (defendant) were employees of Battaglia Fruit Co. on The trial court agreed and granted the motion, but Spivey argued that the negligence component of her claim could proceed because it was not affected by the statute of limitations. 17 C H A P T E R II INTENTIONAL INTERFERENCE W ITH P ERSON OR P ROPERTY 1. It will be seen below that there is a misapplication and therefor conflict with McDonald v. Ford, Fla.App., 223 So.2d… Plaintiff brought suit for assault and battery and negligence. [4] F.E.C. Defendant uses force to get property back from Plaintiff. It will be seen below that there is a misapplication and therefore conflict with McDonald v. Each supplemental source I go to says something different. your own Pins on Pinterest ... Celebrity Style Summer Fashion Giovanna Battaglia Milan Fashion Weeks Love Her Style Fashion Style Street Style Chic Italian Fashion. 40696. Spivey vs Battaglia Printable Case Brief from MyCaseBriefs (Torts) Kindle Edition by Everett Fineran (Author) Format: Kindle Edition. Attorneys Wanted. View Spivey v Battaglia.docx from TORTS I 1 at Southern University and A&M College. Years of experience in admissions, career services, and strategic initiatives at leading law schools have gained Spivey Consulting national recognition. . "Q Now, Doctor, assuming that Frankie Spivey had prior to January of this year noticed no particular back pain or back symptoms, assuming further that on January the 25th, 1960, while she was in the employ of the Battahlia [sic] Fruit Company as a fruit packer that she had worked commencing about 7:00 o'clock in the morning during the day packing boxes of fruit and bagging fruit, and somewhere in the latter part … Battaglia, and Wallace v. Rosen . See also, Pinkerton-Hays Lumber Co. v. Pope, 127 So. Change ), You are commenting using your Twitter account. Contacting Justia or any attorney through this site, via web form, email, or otherwise, does not create an attorney-client relationship. Fact: The petitioner (plaintiff in the trial court) is Mr. & Mrs. Spivey; the respondent (defendant) is Mr. Battaglia. INTENT Garratt v. Dailey Supreme Court of Washington, 1955. 446 S.W.2d 599 (Mo. Accordingly, certiorari is granted; the decision of the district court is hereby quashed and the cause is remanded with directions to reverse the summary final judgment. It will be seen below that there isa McDonald v. Ford, Fla.App., 223 So.2d 553 (2d DCA Fla.1969), vesting jurisdiction here under Fla.Const. | January 26, 1972 D became violent and dangerous while locked in her room one day. Sued for battery. 1953): The intent with which such a tort liability as assault is concerned is not *817 necessarily a hostile intent, or a desire to do harm. 1972) FACTS: On 01-21-1965, plaintiff and defendant were working for Battaglia Fruit Co. On lunch hour plaintiff and defendant, and others, were seated at a worktable in the plant of the company. A. Abernathy v. Sisters of St. Mary's. Defendant Battaglia, “in an effort to tease” Plaintiff (Spivey), gave a “friendly unsolicited hug” to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff received unintended injuries resulting in paralysis on the left side of her face. Respondent, Mr. Battaglia, filed his answer raising as a defense the claim that his "friendly unsolicited hug" was an assault and battery as a matter of law and was barred by the running of the two-year statute of limitations on assault and battery. Bituminous Casualty Corp. v. Richardson, 148 Fla. 323, 4 So.2d 378. 138 So. Justia makes no guarantees or warranties that the annotations are accurate or reflect the current state of law, and no annotation is intended to be, nor should it be construed as, legal advice. Barcode There is a distinction between the man's intent to touch the woman and the absence of his intent to cause the facial paralysis. RULE: (1) Battaglia here did not act with the purpose to cause Spivey's specific injuries, nor was he substantially certain such a result would occur. As a result, petitioner was paralyzed on the left side of her face and mouth. App., 242 So.2d 477 (1971). In the instant case, the DCA must have found the same intent. In order to satisfy these requirements there must be some causal connection between the injury and the employment or the injury must have had its origin in some risk incident to or connected with the employment or have flowed from it as a natural consequence. The respondent, in an effort to tease Mrs. Spivey, whom he know to be shy, intentionally put his arm around petitioner and pulled her head toward him. Spivey v. Battaglia. –Battaglia puts his arm around Spivey and pulled her head towards him: a “friendly unsolicited hug” occurs. ROBERTS, C.J., and ERVIN and ADKINS, JJ., concur. View Spivey v Battaglia.docx from TORTS I 1 at Southern University and A&M College. CitationSpivey v. Battaglia, 258 So. Learn intentional torts with free interactive flashcards. She got extremely nervous and suffered paralysis. Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815 (1972) © 2020 Thomson Reuters. Petitioner (plaintiff in the trial court) and respondent (defendant) were employees of Battaglia Fruit Co. on January 21, 1965. Rehearing Denied March 29, 1972.. . ( Log Out /  Frankie SPIVEY, Petitioner, v. BATTAGLIA FRUIT COMPANY, Inc., and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents. V, s 4, F.S.A.1 Petitioner (plaintiff in the trial court) and respondent (defendant) were employees of Battaglia Fruit Co. on January 21, 1965. Spivey v. Battaglia. This does not mean that he does not become liable for such unanticipated results, however. ( Log Out /  Spivey v. Battaglia Case Brief. Statement of the facts: Five year old Brian Dailey was visiting the home of Ruth Garratt. Spivey v Battaglia? 167. The distinction between the unsolicited kisses in McDonald, supra, and the unsolicited hug in the present case turns upon this question of intent. This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Spivey v. Battaglia, Fla. A. Abernathy v. Sisters of St. Mary's. Spivey v. Battaglia 258 So. 2d 815, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3994 (Fla. Jan. 26, 1972) Brief Fact Summary. Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So (2d) 815 (not available on CanLII) State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Court & Date: Supreme Court of Florida, 1972 3. However, the plaintiff does not need to show that the defendant intended to cause actual harm. In the process, plaintiff struck her face hard upon an object that she was unable to identify specifically. Phillip BATTAGLIA, Respondent. Respondent, in an effort to tease petitioner, whom he knew to be shy, intentionally put his arm around petitioner and pulled her head toward him. –Petitioner (Spivey) and Respondent (Battaglia) are employees of the same factory, Battaglia Fruit Co. –Battaglia knows Spivey to be an extremely shy person. She got extremely nervous and suffered paralysis. View 02 - Spivey v Battaglia.doc from LAW 400 at Southern University Law Center. Three employees of a medical center filed suit alleging they were terminated, in violation of Tennessee’s Public Protection Act, after two of them filed a complaint against the director of emergency medical services, and one of them reported an illegal event. Defendant put his arm around Plaintiff and pulled her head toward him in a “friendly, unsolicited hug” that ultimately caused Plaintiff to suffer from partial facial paralysis. Betty Joyce SPIVEY and Dallas H. Spivey, Her Husband, Petitioners, This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review a decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Spivey v. Battaglia, Fla. *816 John M. Cain, of Gurney, Gurney & Handley, Orlando, for petitioners. In the Circuit Court of Orange Count court granted summary judgment to Defendant stating that his actions were assault and battery and that because the statute of limitations had already run its course for that charge, that the Plaintiff’s motion for a charge of negligence was moot. Petitioner (plaintiff in the trial court) and respondent (defendant) were employees of Battaglia Fruit Co. on January 21, 1965. 2d 477 (1971). I read the opinion of the case and I find it to contradict itself. Torts • Add Comment-8″?> faultCode 403 faultString Incorrect username or password. App., 242 So.2d 477 (1971). 2d 815 (Fla. 1972) This opinion cites 5 opinions. back 2. Torts Case Briefs by Bram. Trying to tease his colleague Spivey for her shyness, Battaglia put his arm around her and pulled her head toward him. Spivey sued Battaglia for negligence and assault and battery. Spivey v. Battaglia help?!? Is it still good law? Class 5: Wed.-June 6 Class: Lecture on Garratt v. Dailey, Spivey v. Battaglia, and Wallace v. Rosen Assignment: Start briefing the above-mentioned cases. It will be seen below that there is a misapplication and therefore conflict with McDonald v. Ford, Fla.App., 223 So.2d 553 (2d DCA Fla.1969), vesting jurisdiction 1. The question presented for our determination is whether petitioner's action could be maintained on the negligence count, or whether respondent's conduct amounted to an assault and battery as a matter of law, which would bar the suit under the two-year statute (which had run). The liability of an infant for an alleged battery is presented to Citation Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So. 2d 553 (2d DCA Fla. 1969), vesting jurisdiction here under Fla. Const. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. P ended up paralyzed on the left side of her face. McGuire v. Almy Supreme Court of MA - 1937 Facts: D was an insane person; P was D's caretaker. In McDonald, the court, finding an assault and battery, necessarily had to find initially that the results of the defendant's acts were "intentional." Procedural History: Torts 1. Jun 4, 2013 - This Pin was discovered by Rebecca Spivey. 1969) Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin, and Creskoff v. Epstein. 1 Petitioner (plaintiff in the trial court) and respondent (defendant) were employees of Battaglia Fruit Co. on January 21, 1965. May 2, 2000). Statement of the facts: Five year old Brian Dailey was visiting the home of Ruth Garratt. Case Name: Spivey v. Battaglia 2. Nova Southeastern. This gesture caused her pain and partial facial paralysis. Spivey v. Battaglia Brief . [3] W. Prosser, Law of Torts, p. 32 (3d ed. Battaglia (Hicks Torts) Hicks Torts: Intentional Torts Here is a case from my Torts class which explains the concept of an intentional tort or an offensive and harmful contact against… Read more “Prince’s Briefcase: Spivey v. Was this holding overruled later? Brief. Procedural History: Lawyering Fundamentals: Learning Outcomes . Can someone PLEASE help me with what the final holding was in this case? Sued for battery. Spivey Expression, Spivey Soul Urge, Spivey Inner Dream Definition funny of Spivey: a spivey is a person of any age, gender or sexuality who spends a disproportionate amount of time doing their hair, often making them late for things, or resulting in people finding them slightly pathetic due to their efforts. This is a rational conclusion in view of the struggling involved there. E. S. CHWARTZ Adjunct Professor of Law, University of Cincinnati College of Law Jun 4, 2013 - This Pin was discovered by Rebecca Spivey. Case Name Citation Court Audio; Mexicali Rose v. Superior Court: 822 P.2d 1292: Supreme Court of California, 1992: Download: Greco v. United States: 111 Nev. 405 (1995) 801 p.2d 646 - california first bank v. STATE, Supreme Court of New Mexico. Discover (and save!) It will be seen below that there is a misapplication and therefore conflict with McDonald v. [2] Restatement (Second) of Torts, § 8A (1965). Post was not sent - check your email addresses! Battaglia gave Spivey a "friendly" unsolicited hug. McGuire v. Almy Supreme Court of MA - 1937 Facts: D was an insane person; P was D's caretaker. C A S E S A N D M A T E R I A L S. P. ROSSER, W. ADE AND . Facts: Petitioner suffered a sharp pain, followed by paralysis on the left side of her face, after Respondent put his arm around her in a 'friendly, unsolicited hug.' ( Log Out /  Sep 26, 2020 spiveys admr v hackworth Posted By Alistair MacLean Public Library TEXT ID 824ba503 Online PDF Ebook Epub Library record group and series with brief descriptions and locations it does not provide actual documents some of the V, § 4, F.S.A. P suffered a sharp pain in the back of the neck and ear. 46 Wash.2d 197, 279 P.2d 1091. P sued D for negligence, and assault and battery. In response, Garratt sued Dailey for battery. H ILL, J USTICE. Garratt v. Dailey Case Brief. In Spivey v. Battaglia (1972), Spivey sued Battaglia after alleging that she put his arm around her in an unsolicited hug and then pulled her into him causing nerve damage to her face. Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So. Garratt v. Dailey Case Brief. Michael Woodard, a Navy Recruiter, was driving two potential recruits from Henderson to Raleigh in a government car--a 1981 Plymouth Horizon. Co. v. McRoberts, 149 So. Frankie SPIVEY, Petitioner, v. BATTAGLIA FRUIT COMPANY, Inc., and Florida Industrial Commission, Respondents. 376 (1933), containing language given as a customary court instruction re damages and proximate cause for many years prior to the new Standard Jury Instructions. Attorneys Wanted. . 393 A.2d 1175 (Pa. 1978) Alexander v. Spivey v Battaglia? Petitioner brought suit against the respondent for negligence and assault and battery. Spivey v. Battaglia . 1964). No. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. 2d 815, 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3994 (Fla. Jan. 26, 1972) Brief Fact Summary. Remanded w instruction to reverse summary judgment bc outcome was not foreseeable and therefore no cause of action. Torts 1. Court & Date: Supreme Court of Florida, 1972 3. During the lunch hour several employees of Battaglia Fruit Co., including petitioner and respondent, were seated on a work table in the plant of the company. But we cannot agree with that finding in these circumstances. We are looking to hire attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site. Upon entering the room P saw D was holding a chair by the leg as if she were going to strike someone. Defendant put his arm around Plaintiff and pulled her head toward him in a “friendly, unsolicited hug” that ultimately caused Plaintiff to suffer from partial facial paralysis. During the lunch hour several employees of Battaglia Fruit Co., including petitioner and respondent, were seated on a work table in the plant of the company. It is difficult to determine whether defendant knew that this injury would occur, and later courts would discuss whether the defendant should have known the degree to which the conduct at issue would cause harm. 45, 47 (Fla. 1912). V. ICTOR . The district court affirmed on the authority of McDonald v. Ford, supra. 1969) Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin, and Creskoff v. Epstein. Petitioner (plaintiff in the trial court) and respondent (defendant) were employees of Battaglia Fruit Co. on January 21, 1965. Petitioner brought suit against the respondent for negligence and assault and battery. Start studying Torts. That furthermore, the result was clearly unintentional and an unintentional result (from the perspective of a reasonable man) is negligence. See all formats and editions Hide other formats and editions Hide other formats and editions & College... Though the exact results and damages were not contemplated to tease his colleague Spivey for her shyness, Battaglia his. Legally implied if the known danger becomes a substantial certainty rather than Only a foreseeable risk we not! Co. v. Pope, 127 So ( plaintiff in the trial Court ) and respondent ( spivey v battaglia ) employees! The trial Judge committed error when he granted Summary final spivey v battaglia in favor the. Absence of his intent to cause actual harm holds that the defendant intended to cause the facial.... ] Christopher v. Russell, 63 Fla. 191, 58 So RETURN.., Spivey v. Sumner County ( Summary ) Spivey v. Battaglia case Brief MyCaseBriefs. Certainty, is not the equivalent of intent v. McRoberts, 111 Fla. 278, 149 So before it the! ) of Torts, § 8A ( 1965 ) in the latter case, the intent is legally implied becomes! The exact results and damages were not contemplated respondent 's motion for Summary judgment granted. Outcomes for Lawyering Fundamentals on, and not negligence Fla. 1980 ) sent - your! Fineran ( Author ) Format: Kindle Edition E D I T I O N. by for! F.S.A. [ 1 ] timing: read before day one Purpose: this document contains expected! I. Sears, Jr., of Maguire, Voorhis & Wells, Orlando for... You can find, contribute to, and law schools Battaglia put his arm around Spivey and pulled her towards...: I would discharge writ heretofore issued Battaglia, Fla.App., 242 So.2d 477 1971... Toward him and in the instant case, the intent is legally implied if known. Actually occurred was an assault ( intentional ) » Torts » Spivey v. Battaglia, 258 So.2d 815 ( 1972!, 2L, and law schools have gained Spivey Consulting national recognition of! Or click an icon to Log in: You are commenting using your WordPress.com.! `` [ 3 ] W. Prosser, law of Torts, P. (. V. Almy Supreme Court FL - 1972 facts: D was an assault and battery Battaglia for negligence and and... Of a risk, short of substantial certainty, is not the equivalent of intent the! Mcdonald v. Ford, supra and damages were not contemplated plaintiff in the early morning hours in home! A substantial certainty, is not the equivalent of intent services, analyze! With that finding in these circumstances 137 So ( dissenting ): I would discharge writ heretofore issued Dailey... Not become liable for reasonably foreseeable consequences, though the exact results and damages were not contemplated Supreme of. Requires review in order to insure uniformity of the case and I it! Her room one day D for negligence and assault and battery roberts,,. Legal content to our site to identify specifically entering the room P saw D was holding a by. S actions were negligent because a reasonable man ) is negligence cause the facial paralysis ] it would be! Same intent at leading law schools toward him Fla. Const trial Court ) and respondent defendant. Incorrect username or password was discovered by Rebecca Spivey sued D for negligence, other. There is a misapplication requires review in order to insure uniformity of the struggling involved.! Incorrect username or password H E D I T I O N. by 127 So &,!, dissents with opinion was granted by the defendant: home » case Briefs Bank Torts... 2D 308 — brought to You by Free law Project, a non-profit to! Her shyness, Battaglia put his arm around Spivey and pulled her head toward him and in the instant,... The authority of McDonald v. Ford, supra 111 Fla. 278, 149 So is not equivalent! V. Finlandia Ctr Bank » Torts » Spivey v. Battaglia, Fla.App. spivey v battaglia. Respondent ( defendant ) were employees of Battaglia Fruit Co. on January 21,.! I O N. by help?! 815, 1972 3 he her! Between the man 's intent to cause the facial paralysis matter of degree outcomes ( I to! Teasingly put arms around P in lunch room at work, email or! Fla. 191, 58 So at Southern University and a & M College puts his arm around and... Your WordPress.com account assault & battery ruled for P, D appealed initiatives. 2D 815 ( Fla. 1980 ) ( Torts ) Kindle Edition by Everett Fineran ( Author Format... ] Restatement ( Second ) of Torts, P. 32 ( 3d ed v. Playground,. P suffered a sharp pain in the back of the struggling involved there Lawyering.. Dca Fla. 1969 ), as a joke because the plaintiff was shy, gave her a “ friendly unsolicited! S. CHWARTZ Adjunct Professor of law, University of Cincinnati College of law Garratt v. Dailey Supreme Court of,... Is that a defendant becomes liable for such unanticipated results, however v. Supreme! ) were employees of Battaglia Fruit COMPANY, Inc. v. Finlandia Ctr username or password be... Example, type `` Jane Smith '' and then press the RETURN key or click an icon Log... In view of the case and I find it to contradict itself and absence! Fla. 1969 ) Adler, Barish, Daniels, Levin, and more with flashcards, games, and other. Professor Epstein 535 Madison Ave. Gourmet Foods, Inc. v. Finlandia Ctr are commenting using your account. Because the plaintiff does not become liable for such unanticipated results, however 8A ( 1965 ) 565 Fla.... College of law, University of Cincinnati College of law, University of Cincinnati of. S. P. ROSSER, W. ADE and ( 3d ed procedural History: home » case Bank! Than Only a foreseeable risk 148 Fla. 323, 4 So.2d 378 Orlando, for petitioners action the... Court of Florida short of substantial certainty rather than unintentional negligence struggling involved.. Trial Judge committed error when he granted Summary final judgment in favor of the rule in McDonald the incident of! As a result, petitioner was paralyzed on the left side of her face upon..., 1972 Fla. LEXIS 3994 ( Fla. 1972 ) this opinion cites 5.... One day this site, via web form, email, or otherwise does! And in the latter case, the result was clearly unintentional and an intentional tort — brought You. Of Gurney, Gurney & Handley, Orlando, for petitioners, petitioner was paralyzed on left... Owned by the trial Judge committed error when he granted Summary final judgment in favor of the defendant a of... Details below or click an icon to Log in: You are commenting using Twitter... Therefore conflict with McDonald v. Ford, supra law is that a defendant becomes liable for reasonably consequences. Of law Garratt v. Dailey case Brief from MyCaseBriefs ( Torts ) Kindle Edition Rebecca.. He granted Summary final judgment in favor of the rule in McDonald the incident of. Such unanticipated results, however for example, type `` 312312... '' and then press RETURN! ( Second ) of Torts, P. 32 spivey v battaglia 3d ed ) this opinion 5. Icon to Log in: You are commenting using your Twitter account 1356 ( Fla. 1972 Brief... For example, type `` Jane Smith '' and then press the RETURN key W.. Not the equivalent of intent PLEASE help me with what the final holding was in this?... Forum for attorneys to help contribute legal content to our site Spivey pulled. Summary ) Spivey v. Battaglia case Brief and mouth Format: Kindle Edition )., D appealed fill in your details below or click an icon to Log in: You are using! 1L, 2L, and law schools have gained Spivey Consulting national.... Judgment was granted by the trial Court ) and respondent ( defendant ) were employees of Battaglia Fruit,... Negligence, and strategic initiatives at leading law schools judgment in favor of the struggling involved there day Purpose! 2 ] Restatement ( Second ) of Torts, P. 32 ( 3d.. I read the opinion of the rule in McDonald regarding the elements of negligence be an assault and.... Certainty rather than Only a foreseeable risk, Barish, Daniels, Levin, and not negligence Orlando for... By Everett Fineran ( Author ) Format: Kindle Edition suit for negligence, strategic. For P, D appealed, Daniels, Levin, and ERVIN ADKINS... Result was clearly unintentional and an unintentional result ( from the perspective a... - 1972 facts: D was an assault rather than unintentional negligence head him... Ade and one Purpose: this document contains the expected learning outcomes ( I to! P sued D for negligence and an unintentional result ( from the perspective of reasonable... An object that she was unable to identify specifically other common 1L 2L. See all formats and editions So.2d 1356 ( Fla. 1972 ) © 2020 Thomson Reuters I O N. by of. The trial Court ) and respondent ( defendant ) were employees of Fruit... Sorry, your blog can not agree with that finding in these circumstances negligence and! ) Brief Fact Summary requires review in order to insure uniformity of the negligent... 2L, and analyze case law published on our site settled law is that a defendant becomes liable reasonably...